Ще копирам статията на немците и сръбския анализ
The So-Called Russian Soul
The hard and pitiless battle for Sevastapol, as well as the recent broad offensive operations of the German army, have reopened a lively debate, above all in the neutral press. Similar to that of the past winter, it is on the issue of the so-called Russian soul. The spiritual as well as the territorial boundaries between Asia and Europe have always interested Western Europeans. It is not to be denied that the ethnic mixture that we called Russia before 1917 and the Soviet Union thereafter has been a riddle to our part of the world. That had nothing to do with tsarism then or Bolshevism today. It simply has to do with the fact that the various peoples joined together in this monster of a nation are not a people [Volk]in our sense of the word.
The many sides of the Russian soul which appears so complex and contradictory to us are in reality nothing but the reflection of the various peoples who are a part of it. It would be a mistake to evaluate it by the standards of Western Europe. What we call Russia has always been a collective mass. Only a small portion of it has made history. Earlier it was the tsarist upper class, today the Bolshevist-Jewish ruling clique. The broad masses of peasants and workers were only tools, having themselves no part in historical events.
The peoples of the Soviet Union live at a level of brutish primitiveness that we can hardly imagine. An exhibition called "The Soviet Paradise" has recently visited Berlin and other large cities, trying to show the nature of life in the Soviet Union through original materials. Normal and naive people can hardly believe it. One often saw groups of civilians discussing the matter heatedly, who then had to be told by a few wounded veterans of the Eastern Front that reality in the so-called workers' and peasants' paradise was even worse than what was presented. It is significant that the campaign against the Soviet Union has not brought back any fond memories of communism. None of our soldiers has seen any evidence of an agreement between the theory and practice of Bolshevism. None has returned from the East as a communist. The veil has been removed. Bolshevism is not a danger for us any longer.
It still seems astonishing that the Soviet army has put up resistance against our troops that they have not encountered in previous campaigns. They fight with a stolid, almost bestial determination, and sometimes show a contempt of death that is more than remarkable. Participants in the Battle of Sevastopol relate stories of the resistance of the Soviet troops that need explanation if they are not to unsettle a large part of the public.
The Russians throughout their history have always shown a particularly stubborn and tough manner of defense, while never being particularly gifted at offense. Their national character has a defensive nature. They are stolid and animalistic. They are accustomed to a hard and impoverished existence, and therefore do not hold on to life all that strongly. The average person has less worth than a bicycle. A rapid birthrate quickly replaces any losses. They have a type of primitive toughness that one cannot call bravery. It is entirely different. Bravery is a kind of spiritual courage. The toughness with which the Bolshevists defended their bunkers in Sevastapol was more a bestial drive, and nothing could be more mistaken than to assume that it was the result of Bolshevist views or education. The Russians were always like that, and will likely always remain so. It is also easier to throw a life away when there is no promise to it than when, even at the moment of danger, a distant paradise still seems to beckon.
One does not need to speak of the enormous danger that the armed uprising of such stolid millions is for Germany and all of Europe. For attacking soldiers, the motive of the defenders is not particularly relevant. The methods the Bolshevist commissars use to drive their troops to the last measure of resistance are not really all that important for the course of battle. It is however important to know it to prevent false impressions. Bolshevism is a master at exploiting the Slavic national soul. Only in Russia was this dreadful experiment possible. It required the primitive and bestial dullness of the peoples forming the Soviet Union, as well as their limited social and economic expectations. Its methods were then implemented with a consistency that amazed the observer.
а ето и анализа
That had nothing to do with tsarism then or Bolshevism today. It simply has to do with the fact that the various peoples joined together in this monster of a nation are not a people [Volk]in our sense of the word.
The many sides of the Russian soul which appears so complex and contradictory to us are in reality nothing but the reflection of the various peoples who are a part of it. It would be a mistake to evaluate it by the standards of Western Europe. What we call Russia has always been a collective mass.
Оно што је чинило Русију, на жалост, нису били једино Руси. Познате су чињенице колико је монгрила било у редовима Црвене Армије, и шта су све радили приликом продирања на запад. Совјетија од 1917. није била рај по којој су се шетали горди, високи и плави Руси. Совјетија је тада много више личила на конгломерат раса и народа, на један општи метеж и затвор. Совјетија нема ничег заједничког са оним што ми замишљамо кад кажемо "Русија". То је поента овог дела текста, и ја се ту слажем с Гебелсом.
The peoples of the Soviet Union live at a level of brutish primitiveness that we can hardly imagine.
Тачно. Али "народи Совјетске Уније" нису исто што и "Руси". Погледајте карту, па прочитајте какав је расни састав био народа који су чинили СССР. Као што сам већ рекао, оно што су Бољшевици презентовали као "Совјетски рај" врло брзо се испоставило као лаж и обмана. У то су први имали прилике да се увере војници Рајха на Источном фронту.
The Russians throughout their history have always shown a particularly stubborn and tough manner of defense, while never being particularly gifted at offense. Their national character has a defensive nature. They are stolid and animalistic. They are accustomed to a hard and impoverished existence, and therefore do not hold on to life all that strongly.
Ово је глупост. Сетивши се разбијања Хазарског каганата, монгрилске прото-бугарске државе, и сличних догађаја, могу само да се насмејем на ово. Но, сетимо се да у рату посао министра пропаганде није да велича, већ да понизи своје непријатеље. Гебелс је чак и преблаг. Шта би ви рекли о онима који одузимају сваког дана на стотине живота наших сународника?
The average person has less worth than a bicycle. A rapid birthrate quickly replaces any losses. They have a type of primitive toughness that one cannot call bravery. It is entirely different. Bravery is a kind of spiritual courage. The toughness with which the Bolshevists defended their bunkers in Sevastapol was more a bestial drive, and nothing could be more mistaken than to assume that it was the result of Bolshevist views or education. The Russians were always like that, and will likely always remain so. It is also easier to throw a life away when there is no promise to it than when, even at the moment of danger, a distant paradise still seems to beckon.
Е сад, каже Гебелс, живот човека у СССР није вредео више од обичног бицикла. Деца издавала родитеље, комшија комшију... јел вам позната ова ситуација?
Свиђало се неком то или не, ово је апсолутно тачно.
Bolshevism is a master at exploiting the Slavic national soul
Ово је погодак у срж проблема. И на жалост велику, још једна тачна констатација....па наставља:
..Only in Russia was this dreadful experiment possible. It required the primitive and bestial dullness of the peoples forming the Soviet Union, as well as their limited social and economic expectations. Its methods were then implemented with a consistency that amazed the observer.
Дакле, енормна глупост народа који чине Совјетску Унију (не Руса!!!), обратити пажњу. У многим говорима, тј. у већини њих, акценат је био стављан управо на Бољшевике, Јевреје, комунисте, Совјетске монгриле, а не на Русе.
The workers and peasants of the Soviet Union are like the man imprisoned in a dark dungeon for 25 years, who may easily be persuaded that a kerosene lantern is the sun.
Опет тачно. Разумимо да Совјетија није исто што и Русија. Октобарска револуција је узела свој огромни данак, и претворила ту земљу у рак рану која се морала очистити.
The political commissar has a function in such a system that is absolutely incomprehensible for us. He wields the whip, both among the masses and in the army. He has full power over life and death, and his own head is on the line as well. The stolid masses are at his disposal. They are forced to choose between accepting it all or facing jail at the least or bestial death at the worst. There is nothing like an intelligentsia remaining to put up any resistance. The system has the resources to eliminate it at the earliest stages. The whole country is covered by a spy system that misuses children to spy on their parents. What choice do the stolid and hopeless masses have but to obey with the fatalism that lies within their racial soul, to give themselves up to their fate? What choice does a soldier in a bunker have when the commissar is standing there with a drawn pistol, and systematic Jewish propaganda has persuaded him that becoming a prisoner means not only death, but gruesome torture?
Јел има можда неког на овом форуму ко не верује да је било овако?
Нећу да идем даље, мислим да сам био више него јасан. Копањем по документима, могу наћи колико је монгрила било присутно (процентуално) у Црвеној Армији. Може се и такође наћи какав је расни састав народа СССР-а, има на десетине таквих докумената по нету. Ја јесам велики потшовалац Руског народа, али сам још већи противник бољшевика, јевреја и комуниста. То би требало да важи барем за све нас који се називамо расним националистима.
Начало
Помощ
Търси
Tags
Календар
Contact
Staff List
Gallery
Потребители
Списък с потребителите
Tърси потребители
Hall Of Fame
Вход
Регистрация